![]() ![]() We frame our ideas around 10 strategies that collectively constitute a roadmap for avoiding and overcoming challenges associated with authorship decisions.įor centuries, the scholarly periodical (herein called a “publication”) has served as the primary mechanism by which knowledge is shared and archived ( McKie 1948 Kronick 1991). Rather than dwelling on the problems, we focus on proactive strategies for creating more just, equitable, and transparent avenues for minimizing conflict around authorship and where there is adequate recognition of the entire process of knowledge generation, synthesis, sharing, and application with partners within and beyond the academy. Here we attempt to clarify key concepts related to authorship informed by our collective experiences and anchored in relevant contemporary literature. Debates rage, publicly but mostly privately, regarding authorship. At present, authorship is often the primary way to assert and receive credit in many scholarly pursuits and domains. ![]() Authorship is one of the most divisive topics both at the level of the research team and more broadly in the academy and beyond. In scholarly writing, authorship is widely acknowledged as a means of conferring credit but is also tied to concepts such as responsibility and accountability. For better or for worse, authorship is a currency in scholarly research and advancement. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |